首 页       用户登录  |  用户注册
设为首页
加入收藏
联系我们
按字母检索 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
按声母检索 A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T W X Y Z 数字 符号
您的位置: 5VAR论文频道论文中心法律论文法学理论
   哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想      ★★★ 【字体: 】  
哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想
收集整理:佚名    来源:本站整理  时间:2009-02-04 13:03:27   点击数:[]    

86) ‘Constitutional Protection of Human Rights’, in T. Campbell, D. Goldberg, S. McLean and T. Mullen (eds) Human Rights: From Rhetoric to Reality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  [52] Murphy, W. T. (1989) ‘The Habermas Effect: Critical Theory and Academic Law’, Current Legal Problems 42: 135-65.

  [53] Northey, Rod (1988) ‘Conflicting Principles of Canadian Environmental Reform: Trubek and Habermas v. Law and Economics and the Law Reform Commission’, Dalhousie LawJournal 11: 639-62.

  [54] Pettit, Philip (1982) ‘Habermas on Truth and justice’, in G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.) Marx and Marxisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  [55] Preuss, Ulrich K. (1989) ‘Rationality Potentials of Law: Allocative, Distributive and Communicative Rationality’, in C. Joerges and D. M. Trubek (eds) Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  [56] Raes, Koen (1986) ‘Legalisation, Communication and Strategy: A Critique of Habermas’ Approach to Law‘, Journal of Law and Society 13:183-206.

  [57] Rasmussen, David M. (198 8) ‘Communication Theory and the Critique of the Law: Habermas and Unger on the Law’, Praxis International 8: 155-70.

  [58] Rasmussen, David M. (1990a) Reading Habermas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  [60] Rasmussen, David M., ed. (1990b) Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [61] Roderick, Rick (1986) Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory. London: Macmillan.

  [62] Scheuerman, Bill (1993) ‘Neumann v. Habermas: The Frankfurt School and the Case of the Rule of Law’, Praxis International 13: 50-67.

  [63] Solum, Lawrence B. (1989) ‘Freedom of Communicative Action: A Theory of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech’, Northwestern University Law Review 83: S4-135.

  [64] Teubner, Günther (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law and Society Review 17: 239-85.

  [65] Teubner, Günther (1989) ‘How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law’, Law and Society Review 23: 727-57.

  [66] Tuori, Kaarlo (1989) ‘Discourse Ethics and the Legitimacy of Law’, Ratio Juris 2: 125-43.

  [67] Unger, Robert M. (1986) The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  [68] van der Burg, Wibren (1990) ‘Jurgen Habermas on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments’, Theory, Culture and Society 7: 105-11.

  [美]戴弗雷姆[著] 浙江大学法学院·褚国建[译]

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] 


Tags:


文章转载请注明来源于:5VAR论文频道 http://paper.5var.com。本站内容整理自互联网,如有问题或合作请Email至:support@5var.com
或联系QQ37750965
提供人:佚名
  • 上一篇文章:论和谐与法的价值

  • 下一篇文章:继续解放思想 推进法学研究
  • 返回上一页】【打 印】【关闭窗口
    中查找“哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想”更多相关内容 5VAR论文频道
    中查找“哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想”更多相关内容 5VAR论文频道
    最新热点 最新推荐 相关新闻
  • ››步如澄明之径———法律推理在司法...
  • ››交通事故肇事者逃之夭夭 法律援助受...
  • ››法治中国的可能性
  • ››论清末的司法主权问题
  • ››论人权的国际保护——以米尔恩人权...
  • ››法律与道德法律与道德
  • ››中国宗教法总述(下)
  • ››司法改革八大难题
  • ››立法听证:制度民主的价值
  • ››情事变更原则探析
  • ››哈贝马斯“交往行动理论”对高校德...
  • ››哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想...
  •   文章-网友评论:(评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    关于本站 - 网站帮助 - 广告合作 - 下载声明 - 网站地图
    Copyright © 2006-2033 5Var.Com. All Rights Reserved .