首 页       用户登录  |  用户注册
设为首页
加入收藏
联系我们
按字母检索 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
按声母检索 A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T W X Y Z 数字 符号
您的位置: 5VAR论文频道论文中心法律论文法学理论
   哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想      ★★★ 【字体: 】  
哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想
收集整理:佚名    来源:本站整理  时间:2009-02-04 13:03:27   点击数:[]    

‘Against the Neglect of Content in the Moral Theories of Kohlberg and Habermas’, in T. E. Wren (ed.) The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion between Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [13] Dwars, Ingrid (1992) ‘Application Discourse and the Special Case-Thesis’, Ratio Juris 5: 67-78.

  [14] Eder, Klaus (1988) ‘Critique of Habermas’ Contribution to the Sociology of Law‘, Law and Society Review 22: 931-44.

  [15] Feldman, Stephen M. (1993) ‘The Persistence of Power and the Struggle for Dialogic Standards in Postmodern Constitutional jurisprudence: Michelman, Habermas, and Civic Republicanism’, Georgetown Law journal 81: 2243-90.

  [16] Felts, Arthur A. and Fields, Charles B. (1988) ‘Technical and Symbolic Reasoning: An Application of Habermas’ Ideological Analysis to the Legal Arena‘, Quarterly Journal of Ideology 12: 1-15.

  [17] Ferrara, Alessandro (1986) ‘A Critique of Habermas’ Diskursethik‘, Telos 64: 4S-74.

  [18] Fitzpatrick, Peter and Hunt, Alan (1987) Critical Legal Studies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  [19] Günther, Klaus (1989) ‘A Normative Conception of Coherence for a Discursive Theory of Legal justification’, Ratio Juris 2: 1SS-66.

  [20] Günther, Klaus (1990) ‘Impartial Application of Moral and Legal Norms: A Contribution to Discourse Ethics’, in D. M. Rasmussen (ed.) Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [20] Günther, Klaus (1993) ‘Critical Remarks on Robert Alexy’s Special-Case Thesis‘, RatioJuris 6: 143-56.

  [21] Haarscher, Guy (1986) ‘Perelman and Habermas’, Law and Philosophy 5: 331-42.

  [22] Habermas, Jürgen (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

  [23] Habermas, Jürgen (198S) ‘Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 96-116.

  [24] Habermas, Jürgen (1987a) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2, System and Lifeworld: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

  [25] Habermas, Jürgen (1987b) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  [26] Habermas, Jürgen (1988) ‘Law and Morality’, in S. M. McMurrin (ed.) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Volume 8. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

  [27] Habermas, Jürgen (1989a) The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians‘ Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [28] Habermas, Jürgen (1989b) ‘Towards a Communication-Concept of Rational Collective Will-Formation: A Thought-Experiment’, Ratio Juris 2: 144-54.

  [29] Habermas, Jürgen (1990a) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [30] Habermas, Jürgen (I 990b) ‘Remarks on the Discussion’, Theory, Culture and Society 7: 127-32.

  [31] Habermas, Jürgen (1990c) ‘Morality, Society and Ethics: An Interview with Torben Hvild Nielsen’, Acta Sociologica 33: 93-114.

  [32] Habermas, Jürgen (1992a) Faktizitdt und Geltung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

  [33] Habermas, Jürgen (1992b) ‘On Morality, Law, Civil Disobedience and Modernity’, in P. Dews (ed.) Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas, revised edn. London: Verso.

  [34] Habermas, Jürgen (1993) justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [35] Habermas, Jürgen (1994) ‘Nachwort (zur vierten, durchgesehenen und um ein Literaturverzeichms erg?nzten Auflage)’, in J. Habermas, Faktizitdt und Geltung, 4th edn. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

  [36] Habermas, Jürgen (forthcoming) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [37] Heller, Agnes (1984-5) ‘The Discourse Ethics of Habermas: Critique and Appraisal’, Thesis Eleven 10/11: S-1 7.

  [38] Holub, Robert C. (1991) Jürgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.

  [39] Hoy, David C. (1985) ‘Interpreting the Law: Hermeneutical and Poststructuralist Perspectives’, Southern California Law Review 58: 135-76.

  [40] Husson, Christine A. Desan (1986) ‘Expanding the Legal Vocabulary: The Challenge Posed by the Deconstruction and Defense of Law’, Yale LawJournal 95: 969-91.

  [41] Ingram, David (1987) Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  [42] Ingram, David (1990) ‘Dworkin, Habermas, and the CLS Movement on Moral Criticism in Law’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 16: 23768.

  [43] Jay, Martin (1992) ‘The Debate over Performative Contradiction’, in A. Hormeth, T. McCarthy, C. Offe and A. Wellmer (eds) Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [44] Kelly, Michael, ed. (1990a) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [45] Kelly, Michael (1990b) ‘Maclntyre, Habermas and Philosophical Ethics’, in M. Kelly (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [46] Leedes, Gary C. (1991) ‘The Discourse Ethics Alternative to Rust v. Sullivan’, University of Richmond Law Review 26: 87-143.

  [47] Luhmann, Niklas (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge  Kegan Paul.

  [48] Luhmann, Niklas (1992) ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’, Cardozo Law Review 13:1419-41.

  [49] McCarthy, Thomas (1978) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  [50] Mootz, Francis J. (1988) ‘The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry Based on the Work of Gadamer, Habermas, and Ricoeur’, Boston University Law Review 68: S23-617.

  [51] Mullen, T. (19

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]  下一页


Tags:


文章转载请注明来源于:5VAR论文频道 http://paper.5var.com。本站内容整理自互联网,如有问题或合作请Email至:support@5var.com
或联系QQ37750965
提供人:佚名
  • 上一篇文章:论和谐与法的价值

  • 下一篇文章:继续解放思想 推进法学研究
  • 返回上一页】【打 印】【关闭窗口
    中查找“哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想”更多相关内容 5VAR论文频道
    中查找“哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想”更多相关内容 5VAR论文频道
    最新热点 最新推荐 相关新闻
  • ››步如澄明之径———法律推理在司法...
  • ››交通事故肇事者逃之夭夭 法律援助受...
  • ››法治中国的可能性
  • ››论清末的司法主权问题
  • ››论人权的国际保护——以米尔恩人权...
  • ››法律与道德法律与道德
  • ››中国宗教法总述(下)
  • ››司法改革八大难题
  • ››立法听证:制度民主的价值
  • ››情事变更原则探析
  • ››哈贝马斯“交往行动理论”对高校德...
  • ››哈贝马斯交往行为理论中的法律思想...
  •   文章-网友评论:(评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    关于本站 - 网站帮助 - 广告合作 - 下载声明 - 网站地图
    Copyright © 2006-2033 5Var.Com. All Rights Reserved .