首 页       用户登录  |  用户注册
设为首页
加入收藏
联系我们
按字母检索 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
按声母检索 A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T W X Y Z 数字 符号
您的位置: 5VAR论文频道论文中心法律论文国际法
   中国农村合作化运动及其解体 (The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China)      ★★★ 【字体: 】  
中国农村合作化运动及其解体 (The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China)
收集整理:佚名    来源:本站整理  时间:2009-02-04 14:04:18   点击数:[]    

[本篇论文由上帝论文网为您收集整理,上帝论文网http://paper.5var.com将为您整理更多优秀的免费论文,谢谢您的支持]
  Student:DayongZhou
  
  dayong_77@hotmail.com
  
  TheCollectivizationaandDe-collectivizationinRuralChina
  
  (Zhou,Dayong)
  
  Abstract:theprocessofde-collectivizationtookplace25yearsago,howeveritwasuncompleted,whichdeterminedthatchinahastomakegreatefforttocontinuehisruralreform,inordertoliberatethepeasantandthestatusofruralregionasthePartypromised.InChina,thenon-privatizationreformoccurredalongwiththede-collectivizationwasauncompletedreform,whichremainsthedefectsofbothcollectivizationandsmall-scalepeasanteconomy,thereforeitrestrictsthedevelopmentoftheruralsociety,however,thecurrentsystemseemsunablealsoreluctantlytochangeit.Thispaperintentstointroducetheprocessofthecollectivizationandthemostimportantruralreforminthiscentury,namelythede-collectivization,thedemonstratestheprogressionofde-collectivization,itscharactersaswellastheproblemslefttobesolve.
  Keywords:collectivizationDe-collectivizationcollectiveownershipincomplete
  
  Foreword
  IampleasedthatIamallowedtowritethetermpaperaboutChina.ChinawasinfluencedbyMarxismandwalkedindetourofhistoryforhalfcentury.BeforeMarxismbankruptedinformerSovietUnionandEasternEuropecountries,Chinahadadoptedadifferentwaytoreformfromthosecountries.Becauseofthedifferenceinaspectsofhistoricalevolution,politicalformsandnaturalenvironment,it’shardtocomparetheruralsocietyofChinawiththeseformersocialismcountriesdirectly,also,theprogressionofcollectivizationanditsendaredifferentintwocontinents.
  Ruralchinabeforecollectivization
  Collectivizationwasamarksystemofthesocialiststate.AlthoughintheeraofUtopiansocialism,RobertOwenforexamplehasalreadyattemptedtosetupthecollectivefarm,butitwasn’tpursuedbyforcestrengthofgovernment.EventhefounderofcommunismMarxdidn’tagreethatcommunismcouldberealizedinundevelopedcountrieswithextremelypoorproductivity.ItwasRussia,theserfcountry,inwhichCommunisttookpowerwithoutadequatepreparation;collectivizationwasimplementedbyforce,inordertoconsolidatetheruleingrass-rootcountryside.ThisexperiencehasinfluencedChinaandEasternEurope,becauseoneofthemeritsofthecollectivizationliesinbeingeasytobemanaged,theotherliesinbeingeasytodeprivepeasants.
  Chinawasabackwardcountry,whichsufferedfromignoranceandwarforcenturies.Throughoutthecenturiessome80to90percentoftheChinesepopulationwerefarmersandliveinoneofsome900,000villages,whichhaveanaveragepopulationoffrom1,000to2,000people.Villageswerenotself-contained,self-sufficientunits.Clustersofvillagescenteredonsmallmarkettowns,whichlinkedthemtothewidereconomyandsocietybyprovidingnotonlyopportunitiestobuyandsellbutalsoopportunitiesforentertainment,information,sociallife,andahostofspecializedservices.ThetraditionalChineseelite,oftenreferredtoinEnglishasthegentrydispersedacrossthecountryandoftenlivedinruralareas,wheretheywerethedominantfiguresonthelocalscene,normallyruledvillages.Althoughtheyheldland,whichtheyrentedtotenantfarmers,theyneitherpossessedlargeestateslikeEuropeannoblesnorheldhereditarytitles.However,theytraditionallyinterpretedcentralpoliciesandnationalvaluesforvillagers.Asinfeudalrelationship,thepeasantsandgentrylivedependoneachother.Gentryprovidedlandtopoorpeasantsandtenant,andworkwithrichandmiddlepeasantstosecuretheorderinvillage,forinstanceopeningschoolandbuildingbasicinfrastructurestomaintaintheresocialstatus.InChinesehistory,atthebeginningofverydynasty,thelandrelationshipbetweenlandlordandpoorpeasantswerecomparablyfair,thatmeant,peasanthaveparcelfarmlandtoliveon.Butlandtendedtobeconcentratedonendeverydynasty,thentheremightbeapeasantuprisingledtoanewdynastyandretributionofland.ThisisthebasicclueofsocialevolutioninChinabeforecommunistperiod.
  AftertheChineseCommunistPartycameintopowerinmainland,ithadtokeepitspromise,whichitmadeduringtheperiodofwartoencouragethepeasanttojointhearmy,thatitwouldgavepeasanttheirownland.Thefirstmajoractiontookplacefrom1940stoearly1950s.June1950,anewLandReformLawofnewPeople’sRepublicwaspromulgatedandstipulatednullificationofthefeudallandownershipsystem,andinstitutionalizationofthesystemoflandownershipbypeasants,inwhichthePartysentagentstoeveryvillagetocarryoutthelandreformpolicy.Thisinitselfwasanunprecedentedshowofpoliticalpowerandtheresolutionoftransformanoldsociety.Thereformwassuccessful,becausethepeasantssupportedthepolicy;mostofthemhadbeenwaitingforthereformforlongtime.Inthelightofthereformlaw,landwereredistributefromthelandlords,land-owningtrustsorwealthierfamiliestothepoorsegmentsinthesamevillage;villageelites,whomightbeexpectedtogoupagainstthePartyanditsprogramswerebroughtdown;newleadershipwasestablishedbypoorpeasantswhoshowedthemostloyaltytotheparty’sgoals;insteadofkinshipgrouporpatron-clientties,classstatusbecamenewrelationshipamongvillagers.
  theprocessofCollectivization
  However,theParty’sleaderswerenotsatisfiedwiththeprivatizationofland,atonehand,suchownership,accordingtothedoctrineofsocialism,shouldhavebeenabolishedinthestateofsocialism,atanotherhand,privateownershipofsmallpeasantryhadnofunctionofpropertyaccumulationforthecountry.Atthattime,inordertoacceleratetheconstructionofsocialism,ChinahadlaunchedTheFirstFive-YearPlanaftertheSovietmodel;heavyindustrydevelopmentwasprofoundstressedsincetheleadersofCommunistPartyregardsocialistcountryasacountrywithdevelopedindustrysectors.However,thesituationinearly1950swasnotidealforanewcountry.Pressingofneedsforfoodinacountrywithburgeoningpopulation,domesticcapitalforinvestment,andpurchaseofSoviet-suppliedtechnology,capitalequipment,andmilitaryhardware.Tosatisfytheseneeds,collectivizeagriculturewasputforward.Collectivizationwasregardasamethodtoturncountrysidetostabilebacking,whichcanbemanagedassemi-militaryandhadrarecontactwithoutside,sothatthegovernmentcouldpressthepriceofagriculturalproductsbymeansofscissorsdifferencebetweencitiesandcountryside,andseizehugenumbersofprofitfromagricultureeconomiestosupporttheindustrializationincity.Atthesametime,thegovernmenthadalreadynationalizedbanking,industry,andeventrade.Privateenterprisewasalreadyvirtuallyabolishedinnationalwide.
  Despiteint

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]  下一页


Tags:


文章转载请注明来源于:5VAR论文频道 http://paper.5var.com。本站内容整理自互联网,如有问题或合作请Email至:support@5var.com
或联系QQ37750965
提供人:佚名
  • 上一篇文章:由世界产权贸易市场引发的法律思考

  • 下一篇文章:欧盟扩张的危险与挑战 (Risks and Challenges of the EU expansion)
  • 返回上一页】【打 印】【关闭窗口
    中查找“中国农村合作化运动及其解体 (The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China)”更多相关内容 5VAR论文频道
    中查找“中国农村合作化运动及其解体 (The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China)”更多相关内容 5VAR论文频道
    最新热点 最新推荐 相关新闻
  • ››浅析“入世”后我国海运服务贸易法...
  • ››试析国际技术转让中商业行为的限制...
  • ››北约东扩、华约瓦解之渊源
  • ››提单的性质与提单权利
  • ››人道主义干涉在国际法中的地位及其...
  • ››公共秩序保留制度再探讨
  • ››比较法方法的一个注释――海上货物...
  • ››去意识形态化——WTO法律机制解决中...
  • ››从主权平等的发展看我国四十年来国...
  • ››韩国国际私法的回顾与展望(下)
  • ››中国农村的创新与发展 ---浅析中...
  • ››中国农村金融发展路径选择
  • ››中国农村教育:问题与出路
  • ››中国农村二元权力结构论
  • ››中国农村合作化运动及其解体 (The ...
  • ››中国农村家庭生产方式存在和发展的...
  • ››中国农村 出路何在
  •   文章-网友评论:(评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    关于本站 - 网站帮助 - 广告合作 - 下载声明 - 网站地图
    Copyright © 2006-2033 5Var.Com. All Rights Reserved .