incapacityoftheparties.
　　AsforthesuggestionoftheMinistryofForeignEconomicandTrade,adoptionofthetradetermsofCIForCFRisreallymorebeneficialtopreventreleasingofgoodswithoutB/LthanFOB.JustasMr.YangLiangyisaid:“IfthetermFOBisadopted,theconsigneecontrolstheshippingandtakeschargeoftheshipchartering.Hecaninsistthatoneprovisionshouldbeputdowninthecharterparty,stipulatingthattheshipownermustreleaseofgoodswithoutB/LatthedischargingportorthedamageofwaitingfortheB/Ltodischargedoesn’tconstitutethedemurrage.”Incase,originalB/Lcannotbemadeavailableatthedischargingport,thenvessledtoreleasethecargoagainstCharter’sletterofindemnityinaccordancetoOwner’sP&IClubwording”.[45]But,meanwhile,weshouldrecognizethatmostofthefraudulencesofB/LcomefromthebuyerincontractCIPorCIF.IfmanycontractsofCIPorCFRaretobeadopted,thequantityofourexporttradewillbeinfluenced.
　　Summarizingallthementionedabove,thelegalcharacterofB/LdeterminestheabsenceoflegalbasisoftheactofreleasingofgoodswithoutB/L.ItwavesthelegalpositionofB/Lasthetitleofdocument.Weshouldnotquanlificateuniformlytotheresponsibilityofthisact.Instead,weshouldanalyzealltheresponsibilitywhichmayresultin,suchasbreachofcontract,tort,concurrentofresponsibilityandunrealjointandseveralresponsibilitiesaccordingtotheconcretesituations.Whileatpresent,tosomeextent,theactoftakingdeliverywithcopiedB/Linadditiontoletterofguaranteeisbeneficialtoacceleratetothecirculationofgoodsandrelievethepressureofthecrowdedport.Butit’salsoaninfringementtotheinterestoftheholderoforiginalB/Lifadoptedfrequently.Thecriterionof“goodfaithandmalice”injuridicalpracticeisdifferenttograsp,sowe’dbetterstipulatetheissueofletterofguaranteedefinitelyinthe《MaritimeLawofPRC》.Isuggestadoptingthefollowingmodel:“LetterofguaranteeisthecontractofsuretyshipbetweenthecarrierandthepersonwhotakesdeliverywithoutB/L.Itistheaccessoryobligationofthemasterobligationofundueenrichment.Thevalidityaboutitisinthelightoftheregulationsof《GuaranteeLawofPRC》.Atpresent,theseveralresolutionswhichpeoplehavepresentedarereasonabletosomeextent,butallofthemhavedisadvantageouseither.Inthefinialanalysis,thesolvingoftheproblemliesinenhancingpeople’slegalideology,andclarifyingtheriskofreleasingofgoodswithoutB/L.Moreover,weshouldcutdownthebarriersintheprocessofexchangeofdocuments.Findoutthebestbalancepointbetweenjustice，Securityandefficiencyfromtherespectsofsubjectiveandobjective.


转自： 声 明： 本论文仅供学术研究参考使用， 版权为原作者所有，如有不妥，请来信指正。