况下使用特殊或附加规则和程序，并应在避免抵触所必须的限度内使用本谅解所列规则和程序”。该规定直接支持“特别规定优先一般规定”的国际法原则。见《世界贸易组织乌拉圭回合多边贸易谈判结果法律文本》，法律出版社，2001年，第354页。
    [11] 英文原文：Because the second sentence of Section III:2 provides for a separate and distinctive consideration of the protective aspect of a measure in examining its application to a broader category of products that are not ‘like products’ as contemplated by the first sentence, we agree with the Panel that the first sentence of Section III:2 must be construed narrowly so as not to condemn measures that its strict terms are not meant to condemn. 见 Japan – Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS8&10&11/AB/R。
    [12] United States - Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline，WT/DS2/AB/R.
    [13] 《维也纳条约法公约》第31条解释通则：1．条约应依其用语按其上下文并参照条约之目的及宗旨所具有之通常意义，善意解释之。2．就解释条约而言，上下文除指连同弁言及附件在内之约文外，并应包括：（a）全体当事国间因缔结条约所订与条约有关之任何协定；（b）一个以上当事国因缔结条约所订并经其它当事国接受为条约有关文书之任何文书。3．应与上下文一并考虑者尚有：（a）当事国嗣后所订关于条约之解释或其规定之适用之任何协定；（b）嗣后在条约适用方面确定各当事国对条约解释之协定之任何惯例；（c）适用于当事国间关系之任何有关国际法规则。4．倘经确定当事国有此原意，条约用语应使其具有特殊意义。第32条解释之补充资料：为证实由适用第31条所得之意义起见，或遇依第31条作解释而：（a） 意义仍属不明或难解；或（b） 所获结果显属荒谬或不合理时，为确定其意义起见，得使用解释之补充资料，包括条约之准备工作及缔约之情况在内。
    [14] 见前注《维也纳条约法公约》第31.1条的条约内容。
    [15] 见前注17《维也纳条约法公约》第31条。
    [16] 见前注17《维也纳条约法公约》第32条。
    [17] 英文原文：Article 31 of the Vienna Convention provides that the words of the treaty form the foundation for the interpretive process: "interpretation must be based above all upon the text of the treaty".
    [18] 英文原文：The terms of Article III must be given their ordinary meaning -- in their context and in the light of the overall object and purpose of the WTO Agreement.Thus, the words actually used in the Article provide the basis for an interpretation that must give meaning and effect to all its terms.The proper interpretation of the Article is, first of all, a textual interpretation.
    [19] 见Japan – Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages（WT/DS8&10&11/AB/R）脚注第16。另见Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II, p. 219 (1966).
    [20] 英语原文：A fundamental tenet of treaty interpretation flowing from the general rule of interpretation set out in Article 31 is the principle of effectiveness (ut res magis valeat quam pereat). In United States - Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, we noted that "[o]ne of the corollaries of the ‘general rule of interpretation’ in the Vienna Convention is that interpretation must give meaning and effect to all the terms of the treaty. An interpreter is not free to adopt a reading that would result in reducing whole clauses or paragraphs of a treaty to redundancy or inutility".
    [21] Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, WT/DS121/AB/R, 2000年1月12日。上诉机构报告第81段。英文原文：Yet a treaty interpreter must read all applicable provisions of a treaty in a way that gives meaning to all of them, harmoniously. And, an appropriate reading of this "inseparable package of rights and disciplines" must, accordingly, be one that gives meaning to all the relevant provisions of these two equally binding agreements.
    [22] 见前注11。
    [23] United States – Transitional Safeguard Measures on Combed Cotton Yarn from Pakistan, WT/DS192/AB/R, 2001年10月8日。
    [24] DSU第11条规定专家组的职能为：“对其审议的事项做出客观评估，包括对该案件事实及有关适用协定的适用性和与有关适用协定的一致性的客观评估”。《世界贸易组织乌拉圭回合多边贸易谈判结果法律文本》，法律出版社，2001年，第362页。
    [25] SGA第3条规定实施保障措施的调查程序为：“主管机关应公布一份报告，列出其对所有有关事实问题和法律问题的调查结果和理由充分的结论”。《世界贸易组织乌拉圭回合多边贸易谈判结果法律文本》，法律出版社，2001年，第276页。
    [26] 英文原文：“panels must examine whether the competent authority has evaluated all relevant factors; they must assess whether the competent authority has examined all the pertinent facts and assessed whether an adequate explanation has been provided as to how those facts support the determination; and they must also consider whether the competent authority's explanation addresses fully the nature and complexities of the data and responds to other plausible interpretations of the data. However, panels must not conduct a de novo review of the evidence nor substitute their judgement for that of the competent authority.”见United States – Transitional Safeguard Measures on Combed Cotton Yarn from Pakistan（WT/DS192/AB/R）上诉机构报告第74段。
    [27] United States – Transitional Safeguard Measures on Combed Cotton Yarn from Pakistan（WT/DS192/AB/R）上诉机构报告第76段。
    [28] Argentina – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, WT/DS121/AB/R, 2000年1月12日。
    [29] 上诉机构报告第81段：The GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards are both Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods contained in Annex 1A of the WTO Agreement, and, as such, are both  "integral parts" of the same treaty, the WTO Agreement, that are "binding on all Members". Therefore, the provisions of Article XIX of the GATT 1994 and the provisions of the Agreement on Safeguards are all provisions of one treaty, the WTO Agreement. They entered into force as part of that treaty at the same time. They apply equally and are equally binding on all WTO Members. And, as these provisions relate to the same thing, namely the application by Members of safeguard measures, the Panel was correct in saying that "Article XIX of GATT and the Safeguards Agreement must a fortiori be read as representing an inseparable package of rights and disciplines which have to be considered in conjunction."

上一页  [1] [2] [3]